Monitoring Drug Abuse in South Africa
Monitoring Drug Abuse in the SADC region

alcohol action plan briefing to SA Department of Health
Charles Parry, PhD
Medical Research Council,
10 March 1997

Introduction
Minister Zuma has made a positive stand on the need to address alcohol abuse from as early as 1994. As recently as 25/2/97, she was quoted in the Cape Times as saying that the Government is very worried about the ill effects that flow from alcohol abuse. Within the Department of Health she has taken various positive steps. In 1995 she convened a consultative meeting in the substance abuse area. Later that year, a strategic plan to address mental health and substance abuse was completed and a report written. Early in 1996, the document “Towards a National Health System” was released. This set out broad policy direction in the substance abuse area. Later in 1996, the post of Deputy-Director for Substance Abuse was filled.

Outline
I will first provide a brief situation analysis of the nature and extent of alcohol use and misuse in South Africa. Secondly, I will put forward a plan for action, firstly setting out interventions which can be implemented within the health sector, and then look at ways in which the Health Department can support interventions by other sectors. I will highlight the importance of establishing mechanisms for translating policy into action, and then set out a few mechanisms that are, I believe, crucial for translating policy into action both within the health sector and within the broader environment. Finally, I will refer to the role of substance abuse surveillance and evaluation research in the policy process.

Situation analysis
General Background
South Africans consume over 6 billion litres of beverage alcohol per year. This is close to 10 litres of absolute alcohol per adult per year, and places us among the highest alcohol consuming nations in the world. 90% of the alcohol consumed is malt or sorghum beer. Risky drinking is as high 30% among certain groups such as adult African urban residents. This has been demonstrated from various studies looking at consumption. Other risk groups include males, youth (both urban and rural), persons in certain occupations such as mining, and poor women of child-bearing age in rural areas. Researchers at UCT have found that 26% of women from various poorer socio-economic communities in the Western Cape consume sufficient alcohol to place their babies at risk for Foetal Alcohol Syndrome.

The Global Burden of Disease and Injury Attributed to Selected Risk Factors, 1990
An article published by Murray & Lopez (1996) refers to the global burden of disease and injury attributed to selected risk factors in 1990. Percentages are based on Disability Adjusted Life Years Lost (DALY’s) as a percentage of total DALY’s. The percentage for malnutrition is 15.9%, for water and sanitation is 6.8%, for alcohol is 3.5%, for unsafe sex is 3.5%, etc. The percentage for tobacco is 2.6% and illicit drugs 0.6%. The percentages are averaged over both developing and developed societies. In Sub-Saharan Africa, the percentage for alcohol is 2.6%. For developed regions of the world the global burden of disease and injury attributed to alcohol is 9.6%. The implication is that the burden of disease and injury from alcohol misuse may increase as development takes place in South Africa.

MRC Research on the Burden of Disease and Injury from Alcohol Misuse The misuse of alcohol clearly has a large effect on the health sector, principally through the use of trauma services and direct treatment costs. I’d like first to refer to Pedestrian and Driver Pyramids prepared by the MRC’s Trauma Programme. With reference to the Driver Pyramid, research undertaken by the CSIR after office hours found that 7% of uninjured drivers have alcohol levels in excess of .08gms/100ml. The percentages for injured drivers and fatally injured drivers are 29% and 40% respectively. Turning to the Pedestrian Pyramid, 10-13% of adult pedestrians whose alcohol levels were randomly sampled after office hours, were found to have alcohol levels in excess of .08gms/100ml. Research undertaken at hospitals has found that 51% of pedestrians treated for minor injuries and later discharged had blood alcohol levels above .08gms/100ml, compared to 61% for those who had severe injuries and were admitted, and 70% of those pedestrians who were admitted to hospital and who died in hospital.

Over the past three years the MRC has been involved in research to assess blood alcohol levels for all non-natural deaths in the Cape Metropole. In 1995, over half (50.5%) had blood alcohol levels above .1gms/100ml. Only 40% of cases were alcohol negative.

Our best estimate of the economic cost of alcohol misuse, based largely on the experience of other countries, is 2% of the Gross National Product or R9,5 billion per year. Pedestrian deaths in South Africa alone cost the State R1,2 billion per year and at least half of these are alcohol related. I am currently completed a study at a hospital in the Free State which serves six mines to look at the link between blood alcohol levels and hospital expenses and lost production. This should shed further light on the economic costs of alcohol misuse.

A plan of action
Implementing Health Sector Interventions
Only summary information is provided. Further details are available both in a manuscript titled ‘Alcohol Policy and Public Health in South Africa’ and in several short briefing documents. The first step is to identify alcohol problems at the primary health care level. Health workers need to ask patients about their drinking practices in a way which will illicit honest answers. Secondly, there is a need to institute brief interventions for heavy drinkers at the primary health care level. I am not referring here to ‘alcoholics’. Ongoing research in this area has been undertaken by the WHO in various developing countries including Zimbabwe. This research has stressed that the target should be on consumption of alcohol itself and the focus should be on responsible drinking rather than abstinence. Two strategies have been proposed, first very brief interventions of 5-10 minutes of advice giving as well as provision of leaflets. The advice should focus, for example, on encouraging people to drink more slowly, to drink smaller quantities each time and on how to avoid intoxication. On the other hand, brief intervention takes longer and comprises a form of condensed cognitive/behavioural therapy that includes the use of a self-help manual as well as follow up visits. Pregnant women should be encouraged not to drink.

The Department of Health also needs to engage in health promotion with regard to substance abuse. Information needs to be provided to the public at large with regard to responsible, hazardous, and harmful levels of alcohol consumption for males and females. People should be encouraged to drink in moderation, to use food when they drink alcohol and to have at least two alcohol-free days per week. They should be instructed not to drink when taking medication, and not to drink when driving or using other kinds of machinery. Health promotion efforts also need to be aimed at specific populations, such as pregnant women and youth. The Department of Health should also support counter-advertising efforts to ensure that the public can make informed choices about the use of alcohol products. Currently the liquor industry holds the monopoly regarding the amount of information that is provided to the public. Counter advertising should be prepared for radio and television. Consideration should also be given to putting warning labels on alcohol containers as has been done for tobacco. They could contain messages such as on the dangers of drinking and driving and drinking while pregnant. Investigation is needed into the need for greater restrictions on sport sponsorship by the alcohol industry. Attention should also be given to media advocacy to ensure that alcohol is addressed responsibly by the media in programming and reporting.

At a primary health care level, mechanisms need to set up for managing and referring patients with more chronic and acute problems. Protocols for assisting patients to withdraw safely from alcohol should be developed. Detailed facilities should be established at regional hospitals and appropriate referral mechanisms set up. Support should be provided to community structures to address alcohol-related problems, including setting up support groups for families and day care programmes for alcoholics. Work place interventions should also be encouraged. The MRC has provided a resource on this topic.

Finally, there is a need to set up longer-term inpatient programmes (eg. 14 days) especially for rural and peri-urban populations.

Lobbying/Supporting Intervention for Other Sectors
The Department of Health should lobby the Department of Finance to increase excise taxes on beer and brandy by 20-25% to bring it back to 1985 levels. Future increases should at a minimum be linked to the Consumer Price Index. International research has shown that the price of alcohol does have an effect on consumption and not only among moderate drinkers. The Department of Trade and Industry needs to be lobbied to implement and enforce coherent strategies for licensing liquor outlets. The Department of Housing needs to be encouraged in its efforts to upgrade housing, and especially to create recreational facilities as part of development initiatives. The Department of Health should work with the Department of Education in developing and implementing appropriate life skills programmes in the schools. The Department of Health also needs to act as a watchdog with regard to the Police and Justice sectors, for example to ensure the enforcement of existing legislation in areas such as the “dop” system, with regard to the minimum drinking age, with regard to public drunkenness, and with regard to drinking and driving. The Department should also consider working more closely with the Department of Welfare to establish a national clearing house of substance abuse information. Clearinghouses have provided useful information to community organisations and professionals in countries such as Canada and the USA.

Translating policy into action
Within the Health Sector
There is firstly a need to address the training needs of health care workers in detecting, managing, and referring persons with alcohol problems. This could take place via basic training which could include courses in alcohol assessment, handling withdrawal, brief intervention techniques, and referral mechanisms. It could also take place via in-service training, and through the use of written training materials. The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism in the USA for example, has prepared a guide for general practioners on how to address alcohol abuse among their patients. There is also the need to change the attitudes of health workers towards patients with alcohol problems. There is a need to allow more time for direct patient care and in general to increase the focus on preventive as opposed to curative medicine. Particularly important will be the establishment of effective supervision and support structures for health workers who deal with substance abusing patients.

Within the Broader Environment
There is a need for greater involvement of the Department of Health in efforts to develop an intergrated substance abuse strategy, cutting across Government Departments such as Health, Welfare, Justice, Safety and Security, Foreign Affairs, Agriculture, etc. with yearly action plans. The Department should support the creation of a central agency with executive powers and full-time staff to direct this strategy. There is widespread feeling that the Drug Advisory Board should be reconstituted as an executive body outside of Welfare under the Deputy President’s office. Also important are improved mechanisms for engagement of community structures and adequate funding.

The role of substance abuse surveillance and evaluation research
I was encouraged that areas such as trauma, cancer, and drug abuse featured so highly at the Essential National Health Research Priority Setting exercise in November 1996. I hope that in whatever way the Department of Health decides to proceed in addressing alcohol abuse, that resources will be set aside for programme evaluation. There are three reasons why an ongoing substance abuse surveillance/monitoring system is required:

  • To inform policy and planning, especially by acting as an early warning system;
  • To broadly evaluate the effectiveness of interventions; and
  • For advocacy purposes, eg. to lobby for resources.

The Medical Research Council has set up a network of stakeholders in Cape Town and Durban. Indicators have been agreed upon and these are being collected on a six-monthly or yearly basis in three areas, namely the nature and extent of alcohol and other drug use, the consequences of alcohol and other drug use, and thirdly, resources to address alcohol and other drug abuse. Data were collected from a variety of sources between July and December 1996, and in February this year we held the first report back meeting. Funding was received from the United Nations Development Programme and the Medical Research Council and technical support was provided by the World Health Organization and the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

There were both primary and secondary data sources. By secondary we refer to the use of existing data. During Phase 1 (July-December 1996) information was collected from the following sources: specialist treatment centres, acute psychiatric admissions units, the police, mortuaries, the provincial drug and alcohol abuse forum’s working groups, newspaper articles and ethnographic research on drug users, outreach workers and pharmacists. During Phase 2 (January-June 1997) data will be collected from the same sources. In addition, we will be undertaking school surveys and a study of trauma patients (using biological markers). We would like to add a study of arrestees using biological markers. This will depend on the availability of funds.

Selected Findings (July-December 1996)
We noted changes in the nature of consumption towards drugs like crack, cocaine, Ecstasy and heroin. We also noted an increase in juvenile arrests. In Cape Town the percentage of juveniles arrested in the first half of last year was 8% as compared to 26% for the second half. It is clear that youth are being used in drug distribution. With regard to treatment data, we noted that 6% of patients in Cape Town in specialist treatment centres were under 20 years of age, versus 11% in Durban. It is also apparent that new routes are opening up with regard to drug distribution. For example, heroin is now coming in from Columbia. We also noted a gap in drug treatment services in disadvantaged communities. There also appears to be increased availability of illicit substances, both in terms of price and access. With regard to alcohol, this is still the drug for which the most persons are seeking specialist treatment: 77% in Cape Town and 75% in Durban. We also noted an increase in police arrests for drinking and driving by 29% from the last quarter of 1996 as compared to the last quarter of 1995.

We need trend data to keep track of the epidemic just like we would for infectious diseases. This drug surveillance system has proven useful in the USA over the past 21 years in acting as an early warning system and in influencing policy. In the USA it involves 20 cities. Similar systems exist or are being set up in North, South and Central America, the Caribbean, West, East and Central Europe, South and East Asia and Australia. Ongoing state funding is required to ensure that the surveillance system continues beyond Phase 2 (January-June 1997) and to facilitate its expansion to Gauteng and elsewhere.

Conclusion
To recap, I have provided a situation analysis of the extent of the problem, a plan of action which can be implemented within the health sector as well as ways in which the Health Department could influence and support interventions by other sections. The Action Plan has been endorsed by the Western Cape Alcohol & Drug Abuse Forum and by the Gauteng Substance Abuse Forum. A plea was made for establishing mechanisms for translating policy into action, both within the health sector and within the broader environment. The role of ongoing substance abuse surveillance and evaluation research in the policy process was stressed. We have therefore come full circle. Research plays a critical role in defining the situation, and research is also important in the ongoing efforts to direct policy in this area.

Briefing documents provided

  1. Alcohol misuse and PHC (by Charles Parry & Anna Bennetts, MRC).
  2. Work site interventions to address alcohol misuse (by Charles Parry & Anna Bennetts, MRC using material from the US Join Together programme).
  3. The physician's guide to helping patients with alcohol problems (NIAAA).

Additional References

  • Parry CDH. Submission to the Gauteng Department of Economic Affairs & Finance on revisions to Liquor Legislation, 25 October 1996.
  • Lerer L, Matzopoulos R, Phillips R, Bradshaw B. Violence and injury mortality in the Cape Town Metropole 1995. Cape Town: Medical Research Council, 1996.
  • Peden MM, Knottenbelt JD, van der Spuy J, Oodit R, Scholtz HJ, Stokol JM. Injured pedestrians in Cape Town - the role of alcohol. S Afr Med J 1996; 86: 1103-1105.
  • Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Quantifying the Burden of Disease attributable to ten major risk factors. In: Murray CJL, Lopez AD, editors. The Global Burden of Disease: A Comprehensive Assessment of Mortality and Disability from Diseases, Injuries and Risk Factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996: 295-324.
  • Parry CDH. Translating substance abuse policy into action in South Africa. In R. Abdool (Ed.) 10th year commemorative magazine of the Idrice Goomany Centre for the prevention and treatment of alcoholism and drug addiction: From grassroots initiatives to a global response (pp. 35-38). Port Louis, Mauritius: Dr Idrice Goomany Centre, 1996.

Last updated:
30-Oct-2008

Module administrator:
Yolanda.Williams@mrc.ac.za

Technical enquiries:
Webmaster

Copyright © 1999-current
SAHealthInfo TM

 

 

 

To SAHealthInfo home