6. Conduct of research

6.1 Responsibility for overall care of patients

6.1.1 In most cases the person who approaches the patient to be recruited should be the clinician responsible for the routine clinical care of the patient. Where patients are the research participants, the investigator conducting the research project may or may not be the same person as the clinician responsible for their overall care. It may therefore happen that changes in management will be undertaken only with reluctance, for fear of disturbing the research procedure. Alternatively, the usual clinician may not realise that he or she retains overall responsibility for care, being under the illusion that the researcher had taken over this role. Proper communication is essential between all health care workers and investigators who share responsibility for the care of the patient. 
6.1.2 It is important that the ordinary requirements - clinical and other - are not neglected as a consequence of the involvement in research, and that the identity of the person in overall clinical charge of the patient's care is clear. This person should know about the research and be in agreement with it. If there is any likelihood that the patient might be confused about which clinician is responsible for overall care, this should be made clear on the Participant Information Sheet.  

6.2 Responsibility in the conduct of multicentre studies
In multicentre studies it is particularly important that the person responsible for the overall clinical care of the patient should be closely concerned with, or informed of, the running of the research project. His or her agreement should be obtained. This avoids uncertainty on the part of others in the clinical team, if there seems to be conflict between the apparent demands of the research protocol on the one hand, and the interests of the individual patient on the other. The patient's interests take precedence at all times.

6.3 Delegation and research conducted by non-medical health-workers
Where research activities will be delegated by the investigator, the Research Ethics Committee should be satisfied that the investigator will delegate only to individuals with the necessary skills and experience.

Research ideas and projects increasingly emanate from non-medical groups of health workers. In many instances the responsibility for the conduct of the research may be entirely that of the investigating health worker. In most instances, however, it may be necessary to obtain the consent of the relevant clinician for any planned research intervention to ensure that this is appropriate to the patient's state. The collection of samples (or information) from patients should be supervised by the relevant clinician or a skilled person nominated by the clinician.

All research involving patients must be referred to a Research Ethics Committee. In some cases, class approval may be given in advance to applications for minor research or a series of studies of a particular type to be carried out as a regular feature of a research or training programme. Even in these circumstances, the Committee will wish to be informed of each individual study by title at least.

6.4 Responsibility for the welfare of research workers and laboratory personnel

6.4.1 The Research Ethics Committee should stress the importance of safeguarding the welfare of all personnel participating in research. The primary investigator must formulate and apply safety rules and guidelines for the handling of all hazardous materials. The provisions of the Occupational Health and Safety Act, No 85 of 1993, regarding a safe working environment, should be adhered to.
6.4.2 Arrangements for compensation in the event of injury should be dealt with as outlined in the recommendations of Good Clinical Practice.9 Occupational injury should also be compensated in accordance with the Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, No 130 of 1993.

6.5 Adequacy of facilities to carry out research
Where there is doubt about the appropriateness of the facilities in which research will be done, a site visit by representative members of the Research Ethics Committee may be necessary.

6.6 Participant privacy and confidentiality
The right to privacy - which includes autonomy over personal information - is a common-law and constitutional right. It means, for example, that clinicians have a duty to ensure that information concerning their patients remains confidential. Failure to safeguard information may render a clinician liable for breach of confidentiality. Legal exceptions may be imposed in terms of the law, as where clinicians may be obliged to disclose information regarding notifiable diseases. Disclosure may also be made where the patient concerned has consented to disclosure.

6.6.1 It is essential that information about a research participant, whether a patient or a healthy volunteer, should be regarded as completely confidential. This is the case where the information is derived from the medical records or from research activity. Sensible precautions should be taken to preserve confidentiality.
6.6.2 Ideally, no names of persons participating in a study should be on a research record. All participants should be coded, and only these codes used to identify individuals and to prevent, for example, double entries. The principal investigator must take responsibility for keeping a control list of names and codes, and see that confidentiality is maintained. The key to the code should be kept secret by the investigator. Where identifiers are needed to link data to a patient or other participant, they should be kept separately from patient records. On completion of the research, these identifiers should be destroyed, and in all further analysis the codes should be used to distinguish data.
6.6.3 When the research is complete, the need for confirmed confidentiality and security of information remains.
6.6.4 Information about persons participating in a study may be released to a third party only with the consent of the participant or someone legally capable of consenting on the participant's behalf.
6.6.5 Care must be taken to ensure that confidentiality about the identity of participants will be preserved, through the use of coding, for example, when the results of research are published.

 

Last updated:
09-Feb-2006

Module administrator:
adri.labuschagne@mrc.ac.za

Technical enquiries:
Webmaster

Copyright © 1999-current
SAHealthInfo TM

To SAHealthInfo home