finding the evidence

    Example:
    The first step when looking for evidence is to formulate the question which needs to be answered. Looking at the case study described in the text, it would be whether or not Betaseron / Interferon will be beneficial for Mr Moretti.

    After the formulation of the question follows the identification of  possible sources of information.  For most of the questions encountered in general practice, where a swift  response is required, the electronic information sources with frequent  updates will be the best.  These can be on computer disk, CD-ROM or  Internet.  This does not, however, render paper sources of  information obsolete. It is just that  the electronic media is much  more accessible, and well indexed, and most importantly is much more up to  date.   With the internet it is also possible to link to unlimited related and supplementary sources of information.

You may ask: "So I need evidence. Now tell me how and where to find it?"   You find the answer to this question in the following section.

The key aspect of providing evidence-based health care is keeping tabs on the availability, scope as well as the quality of any new resource(s) which might be directly pertinent to your own professional practice.

However, keeping up-to-date means reading journals and this can prove to be very time-consuming. To be able to keep up to date with the current research in e.g. Internal Medicine a clinician will have to read approximately 17 articles a day, 365 days a year. This is not always possible, but clinicians caring for patients need information on what the best treatment for a particular patient may be.

In order to overcome this problem there are several secondary publications available that provide summaries or abstracts of key articles of importance to particular clinical practitioners. 

    Secondary Journals:
    These journals publish structured abstracts of articles which have been  published in other journals.  They also publish clinical commentaries  on specific articles.

    These publications make use of librarians to hand-search clinical journals and, then using previously established subject matter and methodological criteria, they select those clinical articles which seem to be scientifically sound and of which the conclusions should therefore be valid.  Before publication the selected  articles are first screened by a panel of experts in the particular field of the journal.

    Examples of such journals are the following

    • ACP Journal Club  - General Internists
    • Evidence-Based Medicine - A combined subset of ACPJC abstracts with others from journals in general practice, surgery, obstetrics and gynaecology, paediatrics and psychiatry.

    Search Strategy
    Now that the resource has been chosen the search strategy needs to be designed.

    This is done by  identifying the key concepts within the clinical question.  Using our case study it will be Multiple Sclerosis and therapy or therapeutics.

These secondary publications observe two basic principles in order to make information useful to the user.

  1. They use explicit criteria for seeking and selecting the studies that will be featured. It is made very clear to the reader which journals have been covered and how the articles have been selected.
  2. They try to report enough information about the methods of the studies ed. This is to enable the reader to judge for themselves the quality and applicability for a particular situation.

If no secondary journal is available in a particular field, the best is to make use of general journals and use the criteria from a secondary journal to determine the yield of clinically important articles.

By looking for evidence to solve a particular clinical problem, rather than by browsing through journals looking for new evidence which you think you might need later a person will learn much more.

Good questions serve as the backbone of both the practice and the teaching of EBM, and patients serve as the starting point for both.

The basic steps for acquiring the evidence to support a clinical decision are appears in Fig 1.

Figure 1: The steps in acquiring evidence

The steps in acquiring evidence

Module managing team:
Prof Jimmy Volmink
E-mail: jvolmink@
cormack.uct.ac.za;

Last updated:
09-Feb-2006

Technical enquiries:
Webmaster

Copyright © 1999-current
SAHealthInfo TM

To SAHealthInfo home