Part
II: Microscopy
recording and reporting of results
The microscopic observation
must establish, first of all, if there are acidfast bacilli
present in the smear and, if so, the approximate average number
of these bacilli per microscopic field observed. It is recommended
that a uniform pattern of reading is followed, observing 100
useful fields. A useful microscopic field is regarded as one
in which cellular elements of bronchial origin (leucocytes,
mucuous fibres and ciliated cells) are observed. The fields
in which there are no such elements should not be included in
the reading.
Negative
Indicate
the staining method. Report ?negative for acid-fast
bacilli?
for all smears in which no acid-fast bacilli have been seen
in 100 fields.
Positive
Indicate
the staining method. The number of acid-fast bacilli found is
an indication of the degree of infectivity of the patient as
well as the severity of tuberculosis disease. Results should
therefore be quantified. For Ziehl-Neelsen stained smears
the following semi-quantitative method of reporting is recommended:
Quantification
of Ziehl-Neelsen smear results
Quantification
of fluorochrome smear results
When fluorochrome staining
methods are used, smears are examined at much lower magnifications
(typically 250x to 630x) than those commonly used for carbolfuchsin-stained
smears (1 000x). Each field examined under fluorescence microscopy,
therefore, has a larger area than that seen with bright field
microscopy. Thus, a report based on a fluorochrome-stained smear
examined at 250x may contain much larger numbers of bacilli
than a similar report from the same specimen stained with carbolfuchsin
and examined at 1 000x. To minimise confusion that conceivably
could occur when different magnifications are used for smear
examination and quantitative reporting of results, a method
has been suggested whereby the number of acid-fast bacilli observed
under fluorochrome staining could be divided by a ?magnification
factor?
to yield an approximate number that might be observed if the
same smear were examined under 1 000x after carbolfuchsin stain.
A
simple table using the magnification factors enable reports
to be comparable from laboratory to laboratory regardless of
the stain or magnification used:
| Carbolfuchsin
stain 1 000x |
Report |
Number
of acid-fast bacilli observed by fluorochrome at magnification |
|
250x
|
450x |
630x
|
| 0 |
No
acid-fast bacilli observed |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1-9
/ 100 fields
10-99/100 fields
1-10/field
>10 / field |
Exact
count
1+
2+
3+ |
Divide
observed count by 10 |
Divide
observed count by 4 |
Divide
observed count by 2 |
Example:
Suppose 20 acid-fast bacilli are observed per field using the
450x magnification. If this number is divided by the magnification
factor of 4 according to the table, the comparable number of
bacilli that would have been observed under 1 000x is 5 per
field. The laboratory result should therefore read 2+, and not
3+, as originally indicated by 20 acid-fast bacilli per field.
The
microscopy report should be made available as soon as possible,
preferably with no more than 24 hours delay from the moment
of receipt of the specimen in the laboratory. The final microscopy
report should contain the following information:
- evaluation
of the quality of the sputum specimen
- the
staining method used
- the
average number of acid-fast bacilli seen on the smear
- indication
of any large numbers of clumps, which means that the actual
number of acid-fast bacilli may be larger than reported
- report
only the number of acid-fast bacilli seen: do not try
to identify the mycobacterial species
- the
date of examination and the microscopist?s signature
- always
send a report to the referring health centre. Never give the
results only to the patient. If s/he fails to bring
the results to the health centre, s/he may not receive the
necessary treatment
A
model microscopy report form is presented in Annex 4.
All smear results should
be recorded in the laboratory register, which should contain
the following information: patient name, sex, age, name of health
centre and patient number, reason for examination (diagnosis
or follow-up of chemotherapy), microscopy results and remarks
(if necessary). It is recommended that positive results be written
in red ink. Individual patient reports should then be prepared
from the laboratory register.
A
model laboratory register is presented in Annex 5.
|