| Definition
Warburgia Salutaris Cortex consists of the dried bark
of Warburgia salutaris (Bertol. f.) Chiov. (Canellaceae).
Synonyms
Warburgia
breyeri Pott.
W.
ugandensis Sprague
Chibaca
salutaris Bertl. f.
Vernacular
names
Pepper
bark tree, isibaha (Z, V), sebaha (S); amazwecehlabayo
(Z)

Figure
1: Fresh bark
Description
Macroscopical
GR25
Slender,
small to medium sized tree attaining a height of 5-10m;
leaves aromatic, ovate-lanceolate, entire, alternate,
glabrous, glossy dark green above, paler dull green on
underside, 4.5-11 × 1-3cm; flowers (April) small,
axillary, white to green-yellow, up to 7mm in diameter,
borne singly or in few-flowered cymes; fruit a
globose berry, up to 40mm in diameter, leathery, black
when mature; bark rich brown, rough, peppery-aromatic.
Microscopical

Figure
2: microscopical features
Characteristic
features are: the abundant rosette aggregates (cluster
crystals) of calcium oxalate up to 20μ in diameter,
loose in the powdered drug or in cells of the medullary
rays (1); the abundant groups of sclereids of the outer
cortex (5), staining light pink with phloroglucinol/HCl;
pale yellow-brown cork tissue (2+3); the oil cells of
the parenchyma with red-brown contents (1); the abundant
fibres (6).
Geographical
distribution
This
species has a restricted distribution in evergreen forests
and wooded ravines of northern KwaZulu-Natal, Swaziland,
Mpumalanga and the Northern Province (also Uganda and
Kenya).

Figure 3: Distribution map
Quality
standards
Identity
tests
Thin
layer chromatography on silica gel using as solvent a
mixture of toluene:diethyl ether:1.75M acetic acid (1:1:1).
Reference compound: cineole (0,1% in chloroform). Method
according to Appendix 2a.
Rf
values of major compounds: 0,12 (purple); 0,33 (black);
0,53 (black); 0,64 (brown); 0,76 (purple); cineole: 0,76
(blue-purple)
HPLC
on C18 column, method according to Appendix
2b.
Major
compounds:
Methanol
extract:
Retention
times (mins): 7.14; 7.96; 10.13; 11.88

Figure
4: HPLC spectrum
Ethanol
(70%) soluble extractive value: not less than 16.0 % (range:
15.94-23-04%)
Purity
tests
Assay
Not
yet available
Major
chemical constituents
A
number of drimane sesquiterpenes have been isolated from
the stem bark of this and other Warburgia species.
These dialdehydes include: warburganal1, 2, 3, 4
(see a below) polygodial 5, salutarisolide
6, muzigadial 7, 8 (see b below),
ugandensidial, isopolygodial 6 and mukaadial
6. Phytochemical tests in our laboratories
indicated the presence of tannins. The sugar alcohol mannitol
(3%) has been reported as present GR1
Figure
5: chemical constituents
|
Dosage
forms
Powdered
bark is taken orally (aqueous infusion), smoked, or mixed
with fat and applied externally as an ointment.
Medicinal
uses
This
species is highly regarded as an expectorant for the treatment
of dry cough and as a remedy for colds, chest infections,
sinusitis, malaria, venereal diseases, stomach ulcers,
toothache and dermatological disorders GR1 and 12.
Pharmacology/bioactivity
The
biological activity of drimane sesquiterpenoids is well
documented and includes antimicrobial, insect antifeedant,
cytotoxic, molluscicidal and skin irritant effects9.
The antifungal and antibacterial activity of warburganal,
polygodial and muzigadial against a range of organisms,
including Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
Candida utilis, Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia
coli, has been demonstrated 9. Muzigadial
was found to be the main antibacterial agent in the bark
of Warburgia salutaris 8, with an MIC
of 12.5μg/ml against both Staphylococcus aureus
and Bacillus subtilis. The MIC of neomycin,
used as a control in this study, was 0.375μg/ml for
the former organism and 0.2μg/ml for the latter.
Warburganal
has been shown to have cytotoxic and haemolytic properties,
and polygodial to enhance the activity of actinomycin
D and rifampicin (papers cited in GR12). Toxicity
of inner bark extracts has been demonstrated in preliminary
screening tests. (pers. comm. in GR12). Both
root and stem bark have been reported as ineffective in
treating experimental malaria GR1.
The
results of an investigation of cytotoxicity and antiviral
activity of 16 South African plant species10
showed that aqueous extracts of Warburgia salutaris
were markedly cytotoxic, at all concentrations used,
to HeLa, Vero, Jurkat E6.1, AA-2 and CEM-SS cells. These
results are in agreement with findings cited above for
warburganal. Similar extracts were shown to reduce infectivity
of both Coxsackie B2 virus and HSV-1, at most dilutions
tested. In direct in vitro cell culture
antiviral assays, aqueous extracts were however not found
to inhibit replication of either Coxsackie B2 virus or
HSV-1.
Methanolic
extracts of Kenyan bark collections were assessed in
vitro for anti-giardiasis activity, but were found
to be inactive against Giardia lamblia in the concentration
used (1000ppm)11.
Antibacterial
activity of aqueous (conc. 1mg/ml) and methanolic extracts
of South African dried barks was assessed in vitro
against Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus
and S. epidermidis12. The results
were equivocal.
Aqueous
extracts of South African dried leaf samples were assessed
for in vitro molluscicidal activity against Bulinus
africanus and found to be active (LC50:
2.483mg/ml).13
Contraindications
None
known.
Adverse
reactions
None
reported for this species when used in the traditional
manner. Skin irritation and contact dermatitis have however
been demonstrated for individual drimanes e.g. warburganal
and polygodial 9.
Precautions
In
view of reports of possible toxicity, this species should
preferably be used only under the supervision of a competent
traditional practitioner.
Dosage
To
be determined.
References
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
|